Senior engineers who ship 2-3x faster with AI.
Five days to start.
Senior NestJS / Next.js engineers from our own team - each one shipping production code with our internal AI workflow toolkit. No recruiter fees. Two-week paid trial. 30-day exit.
Two-week paid trial · 30-day exit · no recruiter fees
Our unfair advantage.
Not a marketing checkbox.
Every LogicFlow engineer works with our internal AI toolkit - Claude Code, custom MCP connectors, and a skills library we built for our own delivery first. This is not a badge on a website. It is how we actually ship. The result is a senior engineer who covers the output of more than one traditional hire.
Faster PR cycles
Engineers move from ticket to reviewed pull request faster, because the toolkit handles the mechanical work and they focus on judgment.
Fewer defects
Tests, edge cases, and reviews are caught earlier in the loop, so less rework lands on your team.
More output per seat
One senior engineer with our toolkit covers more ground than a single traditional hire. You pay for one seat and get more.
AI Toolkit:
Claude CodeMCPAI-augmented workflowWe do not sell “AI developers” and we do not bill for tools. You judge the output during the two-week paid trial, not on our word.
That open role is costing you $18,000–$45,000
every month it sits empty.
Every week without that engineer, your team absorbs extra load, ships slower, and your roadmap slips. Here is what the vacancy actually costs.
The Breakdown
Monthly Cost of an Empty Seat
$18K – $45K
And that’s before you count the morale drag on the team carrying the extra weight.
Side-by-side: Local Hire vs LogicFlow
| In-House Hire | LogicFlow | |
|---|---|---|
| Time to productive engineer | 3–6 months | 5–7 days |
| Upfront cost | $18–30K (recruiter) | $0 trial start |
| Monthly fully-loaded cost | $10,000–14,500 | from $8,000 ($7,200-8,800) |
| Firing risk / notice period | 2–4 weeks notice | 30 days |
| Tax & social burden | ~30% on top | Included |
| Replacement if not a fit | Start over | Free swap |
The question is not whether you can afford a remote engineer.
It is whether you can afford another month without one.
Find out if your team is ready, before you spend a dollar.
Most remote engineering integrations fail not because of the engineer’s skill, but because the receiving team wasn’t set up for it. Our assessment checks the ten factors that predict success or friction.
Start the AssessmentThe Ten-Point Checklist
- 01You have a defined onboarding process for new engineers
- 02Your codebase has CI/CD and automated tests
- 03Your team uses async communication tools daily
- 04Someone on your side can do weekly 1-on-1s with the new engineer
- 05You document architectural decisions
- 06You have a clear sprint or task management workflow
- 07Your team has worked with remote collaborators before
- 08You can provide access to staging/dev environments within 48 hours
- 09There is a technical lead who can review PRs within 24 hours
- 10You are open to a 2-week trial before committing
What You Get
- Readiness Score: out of 100 with a breakdown by category
- Gap Analysis: showing exactly where integration risk lives
- Specific Recommendations: to close gaps before you hire anyone
- Go / Adjust / Wait verdict: so you know whether now is the right time
Unlike generic quizzes, this assessment is built from 25 years of integrating engineers into existing teams. Every question maps to a real failure mode and a real fix we’ve applied.
Three steps.
One week. Shipping code.
Take the Assessment
Answer 10 questions about your team's processes, tools, and communication patterns. Takes 4 minutes.
Get Your Readiness Report
Receive a score out of 100, a gap analysis by category, and specific recommendations.
Start Shipping in Days
If you're ready, we match you with a senior engineer in 5–7 days. Two-week trial.
We are an engineering company.
We happen to staff.
Most agencies are recruiting companies that bolt on “management.” We are a product-engineering team that built platforms together for years, and now we embed our people into yours.
| Typical Agency | LogicFlow | |
|---|---|---|
| Core business | Recruiting | Engineering |
| Engineer vetting | Resume screen + interview | Built together for years |
| Code quality | You manage it | Our lead reviews every PR |
| Onboarding | Your problem | We run it jointly |
| If engineer underperforms | Start over with new candidate | We coach or swap, free |
| Domain knowledge | Generic pool | Complex business logic specialists |
| Communication | Through account manager | Direct with the engineer |
| AI-augmented delivery | Buzzword on their site | Proprietary toolkit, used daily |
Core Stack:
NestJSNode.jsNext.jsTypeScriptPostgreSQLOracleAngularFlutterComplex Business LogicAI Toolkit:
Claude CodeMCPAI-augmented workflowYou are not hiring a stranger from a database. You are borrowing a teammate from a company that already built what you are building.
Numbers. Not adjectives.
Years in Software
Projects Delivered
Days to Start
Months Avg. Engagement
“
Especially with Roman, he is implementing things fast and with high quality.
“LogicFlow embedded two engineers into our platform team. Within the first sprint they were shipping production code. It felt like they had been on the team for months.”
CTO, B2B SaaS Platform
Verified quote. Client details shared on request
“What surprised me was the code quality. I expected to spend time on reviews and rework. Instead, their lead was catching things our own team missed.”
VP Engineering, HealthTech Startup
Verified quote. Client details shared on request
“We tried two agencies before LogicFlow. The difference is night and day. These are real engineers who care about the product, not contractors watching the clock.”
Founder, FinTech
Verified quote. Client details shared on request
Straight answers.
No spin.
The short answer: we are not an agency. Agencies are HR companies. They screen resumes and guess about technical fit. We are an engineering company. Ihor personally reviews every developer against real production code, work they have done on LogicFlow's own projects. When we tell you someone is a strong NestJS developer, we know that because we have seen their code, not because they said so in an interview. If you got burned before, tell us what went wrong. We will tell you honestly whether we can do better or whether we are not the right fit.
Compared to what? A senior backend engineer in the US costs $140,000–$200,000 per year in salary alone. Add employer costs, benefits, recruitment fees, and equipment, you are at $190,000–$280,000. We are a flat monthly seat: from $8,000/month ($7,200-8,800, roughly $45-55/hr), all-in. That is about $86,000-106,000/year with no recruitment fee, no overhead, and a 30-day exit clause. And our engineers ship with our internal AI toolkit, so you get more output per seat than a traditional hire. The comparison is not us vs. other Ukrainian shops. It is us vs. the fully-loaded cost of a local hire you have been trying to make for four months.
Fair question. We do not sell "AI developers" and we do not bill for tools. Every LogicFlow engineer works with our internal toolkit - Claude Code, custom MCP connectors, and a skills library we built for our own delivery first. We use it daily because it is how we actually ship. In practice it shows up as faster PR cycles, fewer defects, and a senior engineer who covers more than one traditional hire. You judge it on the output during the two-week paid trial, not on our word.
Two guarantees cover this. First: the 2-week paid trial. Pay for month one, work with the engineer for 2 weeks. If it is not a fit for any reason, you get a full refund. No arguing. Second: the ongoing replacement guarantee. If performance drops at month 3, month 8, month 14, we replace within 2 weeks. No velocity gap.
Our team is based in Ukraine (EET, UTC+2). For US East Coast clients we adjust schedules to maximize overlap during your morning hours (roughly 9am–1pm ET). For US West Coast, we overlap mid-morning. All our engineers are experienced in async-first workflows with clear handoffs, so the timezone gap rarely shows up in practice.
Every engagement starts with an NDA and IP assignment agreement. All code belongs to you from day one. Our engineers work in your repositories, your tools, your infrastructure. We do not retain copies of your code. We can also work within your VPN and security policies.
Typically, we do not structure engagements around direct hiring. That said, we are open to discussing it if the relationship is working well and it makes sense for everyone involved.
We take engagements as short as one month, though we find the best results come from 3+ month commitments. Short engagements work best when you have a well-defined scope and good onboarding documentation. The assessment will tell you if your setup supports a short engagement.
Because we are not hiring. Our engineers already work together on our internal projects and client work. When you need someone, we match from our existing team, people we have already vetted, trained, and built with. The 5–7 days covers matching, NDA/contract signing, and environment setup.
Your engineering seat
has been empty long enough.
Every week that role sits open costs you $4,000–$10,000 in lost velocity, burned senior capacity, and delayed features. The math does not improve with time.
Ihor Chalapchii
CEO, LogicFlow International · Chernivtsi, Ukraine
25 years. 400+ projects. Engineers who have shipped in your stack. No account managers. No guessing.